Wednesday, December 03, 2008

ESPN sucks! (so does Texas)

Does anyone at ESPN really understand the meaning of a 3-way tie? The reason it’s named like that is because there are 3 teams involved. Apparently the dummies at ESPN don’t understand this or else why would they keep talking about the head-to-head matchup between OU and Texas and conveniently forget the fact that Texas Tech beat Texas. If neutral field is what counts, then every team should start playing their games at a neutral field, like in London or something, like how the NFL has a game or two there every year. For anyone who doesn’t know what this rant is all about, this is about college football. Long story short, Texas beat OU, Texas Tech beat Texas and OU beat Texas Tech. 
Now, the question is who goes to play in the Conference Championship and then to the National Championship game. Last week, OU was ahead of both the teams in the overall rankings, which was used to break the tie. Now, everyone (mostly at EPN) is complaining that Texas should have been ahead of OU based on the fact that OU lost to Texas at a neutral field (Dallas – some neutral field, huh?) while Texas lost to Texas Tech at Lubbock (away game for Texas). Oh yeah, Texas Tech was blown away by OU at home. Confused yet? So, according to the ESPN analysts aka MORONS, since Tech lost by a whopping 44 points, they are out of contention in a 3-way tie which makes it a head-to-head comparison between Texas and OU and since Texas beat OU, they should be ranked ahead. Are you f*#&ing kidding me? Why call it a 3-way tie in the first place, if that’s what you are going to do? 
Here’s my question: So, if OU loses this week at the Big 12 championship game, then which team should go to the National Championship game? Texas or Tech? Based on what all the experts (!?) are saying this week, shouldn’t it be Tech, since they beat Texas on a head-to-head matchup? Oh, now you want the overall rankings to send Texas to the final game? How pathetic is that? Atleast try to be consistent, you IDIOTS! If the focal point of your argument is the 'neutral field', then mine is '44 points'. That should be more than enough to nullify whatever advantage Texas had over OU. So, here’s the one thing I wish you’d all do: SHUT THE F@#K UP!!!